Directors’ Duties Under the Companies Act 2016: A Practical Guide

By Axecta Management Services, Kuala Lumpur · Last verified: 29 October 2026

Short answer. Under section 213 of the Companies Act 2016, a director must exercise powers for a proper purpose and in good faith in the best interest of the company, and with reasonable care, skill and diligence. Breaching section 213 is an offence carrying up to five years’ imprisonment or a fine of up to RM3 million, or both. Directors may delegate and rely on advice (sections 215 and 216) but stay answerable for oversight.

Axecta provides company secretarial service for companies across Malaysia. Talk to our team.

What the law expects of a director

Every director of a Malaysian company, whether the company is a one-person Sdn Bhd or a large public company, carries the same core obligations. They sit in Subdivision 3 of the Companies Act 2016.pdf), sections 210 to 220, and they are enforced by criminal penalties as well as civil remedies. This guide explains each duty, the protections, and a routine you can follow.

Who counts as a “director” for these duties

Section 2 defines a director as anyone occupying the position of director by whatever name called, and includes a person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the majority of directors are accustomed to act, and an alternate or substitute director. Section 210 then widens the group for the duties provisions: it also covers the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief operating officer or any other person primarily responsible for the management of the company. In other words, a title on the SSM register is not the test. A “shadow” decision-maker or a senior manager running the business can be treated as a director for these sections.

The main duty: section 213

Section 213 has two limbs.

  1. Proper purpose and good faith. A director must at all times exercise powers in accordance with the Act, for a proper purpose and in good faith in the best interest of the company.
  2. Care, skill and diligence. A director must exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence with the knowledge, skill and experience reasonably expected of a director having the same responsibilities, and any additional knowledge, skill and experience the director in fact has.

The second limb is objective and personal. A first-time director cannot argue they did not understand a balance sheet, and an accountant or lawyer on a board is held to the higher standard their expertise implies.

Contravening section 213 is an offence: up to five years’ imprisonment, a fine of up to RM3 million, or both.

Other statutory duties at a glance

Need this done for you? Axecta’s company secretarial service team can handle this for your company. See the company secretarial service service.

DutySectionWhat it requiresPenalty stated in the Act
Proper purpose, good faith, care and skill213Act in the company’s best interest with reasonable care, skill and diligenceUp to 5 years’ imprisonment or up to RM3 million fine, or both
Nominee directors217A director appointed by or as a representative of a member, employer or debenture holder must not put the nominator ahead of the companySame as above
No improper use of property, information, position or opportunity218Do not use these to gain a benefit for yourself or others, or to cause detriment to the company, without consent or ratification of a general meeting; do not compete with the companySame as above
Notice of shareholdings and personal particulars219Give written notice to the company within 14 days of becoming a director or of a changeUp to RM25,000 for late notice, plus RM1,000 a day while it continues; non-notice carries the heavier penalty
Declare interest in contracts221Declare the nature of the interest at a board meetingUp to 5 years or RM3 million, or both

Sections 221 to 225 deal with conflicts and loans to directors in detail. See directors’ conflict of interest and disclosure for those.

The business judgment rule: section 214

Boards must take commercial risks, and hindsight makes every failed decision look careless. Section 214 gives a director who makes a “business judgment” (any decision on whether or not to take action on a matter relevant to the business) a deemed pass on the care-and-diligence duty in section 213(2), and on the equivalent common-law and equitable duties, if the director:

The protection is earned by process: a decision to sign a large contract or buy equipment is far easier to defend if the minutes show what information the board saw, who had an interest, and why it concluded the decision served the company.

Relying on others: section 215

A director may rely on information, professional or expert advice, opinions, reports or statements, including financial statements, prepared or presented by:

Reliance is deemed to be on reasonable grounds only if it is in good faith and follows an independent assessment of the information, having regard to the director’s knowledge of the company and the complexity of its structure and operations. Signing off accounts you have not read is therefore not reliance in the statutory sense.

Directors may delegate any power of the Board to a committee, director, officer, employee, expert or other person, unless the Act, the constitution or a resolution says otherwise. Under section 216(2), the directors remain responsible for the delegatee’s exercise of the power as if they had exercised it themselves. Section 216(3) provides the escape: they are not responsible if they believed on reasonable grounds at all times that the delegatee would act in conformity with the directors’ duties and the constitution, and believed on reasonable grounds, in good faith and after proper inquiry where the circumstances called for it, that the delegatee was reliable and competent.

A worked example (illustrative)

A two-director Sdn Bhd gives its finance manager sole authority over supplier payments. A director who never reviews the bank reconciliations, even after the auditor flags unexplained transfers, will struggle to say they had reasonable grounds to believe the manager was reliable. A director who set approval limits, received monthly management accounts, and acted promptly when an anomaly appeared is in a much stronger position under section 216(3).

Duties that matter most for filings and accounts

The Act places several compliance tasks on directors personally, and these are the ones most often missed in small companies.

What this means for different companies

One-director Sdn Bhd (often the owner-manager)

You are the board, so discipline has to come from process. Keep company money separate from yours and minute significant decisions even when you alone decide.

Foreign-owned companies with a resident director

A resident or local director appointed to meet the residency requirement is not a figurehead. The Act makes no distinction between a director who runs the company daily and one who sits on paper. If you appoint someone to that role, give them real access to the accounts and bank records. For the residency rule, see who can be a director.

Nominee directors

Section 217 is explicit: a director appointed by or on behalf of a shareholder, employer or lender must act in the best interest of the company, and must not subordinate that duty to the nominator if the two conflict. A parent company cannot instruct its nominee to prefer the parent’s interests over the subsidiary’s.

Common mistakes

  1. Treating the secretary or accountant as a substitute for oversight. Section 215 requires an independent assessment, and section 216 keeps you responsible for delegated work.
  2. Signing financial statements without reading them. The directors prepare them under section 248.
  3. Mixing company and personal funds. It breaks the section 218 prohibition on using company property for personal benefit without consent or ratification, and it makes the accounts unreliable. See separating personal and business finances.
  4. Decisions with no record. Without minutes you cannot show a judgment was informed.

Habits that show reasonable care

How Axecta helps

Axecta’s company secretarial team maintains the registers, prepares board papers and minutes, files director changes and annual returns, and flags deadlines before they pass. A clean paper trail is what makes sections 214 to 216 usable in practice.

Next steps

  1. Read sections 213 to 221 of the Act once, end to end.
  2. List what you have delegated and to whom, and note how you supervise it.
  3. Check the filing dates for the annual return and financial statements.
  4. Start minuting decisions if you do not already.
  5. Ask for advice before any transaction in which you or a connected person has an interest.

Frequently asked questions

What are the main duties of a director under the Companies Act 2016?

A director must act for a proper purpose and in good faith in the company’s best interest, and exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence (section 213). Other duties include not misusing company property, information, position or opportunities (section 218), and declaring interests in contracts (section 221).

What is the penalty for breaching a director’s duties?

A contravention of section 213 is an offence punishable by imprisonment for up to five years, or a fine of up to RM3 million, or both. Sections 217 and 218 carry the same maximum penalties. Courts may also order other remedies, so take advice early.

What is the business judgment rule in Malaysia?

Section 214 treats a director as meeting the care-and-diligence duty for a business decision if they acted for a proper purpose and in good faith, had no material personal interest, were reasonably informed, and reasonably believed the decision served the company. It protects informed decisions, not careless ones.

Can a director delegate their responsibilities?

Yes. Section 216 lets directors delegate Board powers to a committee, director, officer, employee, expert or other person. The directors remain responsible for how the power is used unless they reasonably believed the delegatee was reliable and competent, after proper inquiry where needed.

Can directors rely on the company’s accountant or lawyer?

Section 215 allows reliance on advice and reports from officers or experts the director believes on reasonable grounds to be competent. The reliance must be in good faith and follow an independent assessment of the advice, given what the director knows about the company and how complex it is.

Do nominee directors have the same duties?

Yes. Section 217 says a director appointed by or representing a member, employer or debenture holder must act in the company’s best interest and must not put the nominator’s interest ahead of it where they conflict. Breach is an offence.

Does a sole director who owns 100% of the shares still owe duties to the company?

Yes. The company is a separate legal entity, and sections 213 to 218 apply to every director, including one who owns all the shares. Being the only shareholder may reduce practical disputes with other owners, but it does not remove the statutory duties, the filing obligations or the criminal penalties attached to them.

How does a director’s duty differ from a company secretary’s duty?

The directors manage the company and bear the section 213 duties. The secretary keeps the registers, makes filings and advises on compliance; see what a company secretary does. The secretary supports the board, but cannot take over the board’s responsibility for decisions.

Want a director’s compliance routine in place?
Axecta Management Services is a full-suite accounting, company secretarial and consulting firm in Kuala Lumpur, serving companies from SMEs to MNCs.
Ask Axecta about director support

Official sources to check

This article is general information and not legal, tax or accounting advice for your company. Rates, thresholds, deadlines and procedures change, so confirm current requirements with the sources above or with Axecta.